Top 5 rated articles
10 Christmas sex positions for an X-rated Xmas
Hairstyles Finder 2014 - Find Your Perfect Haircut
One month to younger skin: Anti-aging skincare
Helping your partner with his erection problems
How to be good in bed - 10 tips from real men
Debate
Supporting women, ending domestic violence
Article in images

A European directive

 

Strong voice against violence: Martine Levy © Florent Catteau
Strong voice against violence: Martine Levy © Florent Catteau
Do people really have different views of violence against women?
Yes, there is an entire range of interpretations of the term violence. And that is precisely what is unacceptable. Measures must be put in place to allow all forms of violence – from trafficking to female genital mutilation – to be tackled. The main point to be acknowledged is that women are not responsible for the violence.

So, everything is to be allowed – or forbidden – equally everywhere ?
Neither nor. We don't actually want jurisdiction and legislation to be identical everywhere. After all, European directives always provide the opportunity of adapting it to the country's own laws and implementing the provisions within the country's legal structures. But the common definition should set down the parameters for what constitutes violence against women and so result in coordinated action. Unfortunately, the ideas are still very diverse in this area so that there are difficult negotiations ahead.

Maybe it won't be possible to find a common definition for 27 countries?
Everything is always possible. Life teaches us that ...

Why is a European directive actually so important?
Because that will be most effective. Because it is only once you get to that level that you are far enough removed from consequences and can focus totally on the issue. Just think how large a role trafficking plays in the economy or how fundamental an issue the free practice of traditions is for some population groups – however degrading they might be, such as genital mutilation. A national government can often not afford to proceed as strongly as might be necessary. This requires the EU to dictate a strong line, which can be derived clearly from the joint commitment to fundamental human rights for all to see.

And if no joint decision can be reached in the end?
Then it is up to the individual states to take action. Of course this might result in more far-reaching provisions being made than might ever have been possible at a joint European level. But one would then also have to accept that different standards apply within Europe, and that some people are exploited here and thereby robbed of their fundamental rights.

Can you give us an example?
How should cross-border trafficking be fought, for instance? Each year, some 250,000 people are traded in Europe like slaves; people trafficking in Europe is almost as large a source of finance as the drug trade. And we don't want to do anything against that?






  
  

Women in Focus Editor
04/14/2010
Rank this page: 

Don't miss...
100 Quotes About Embracing ChangeNYC Street Style: May 2015
What can you do with a deck of cards to stay in shape?4th episode: Discover some fun exercises to get you in shape while doing the housework!
Latest… 09/12/2016
Guides
Videos
Managing money
Changing your name | How to change your name
Scrapbooking: making a scrapbook album like a pro
Work for yourself - get your small business online
See all Women in Focus guides
Teaching kids about money
See all Women in Focus videos
 

Don't miss out!

...Join our newsletter
Get the wewomen latest straight to your inbox
  OK
Find us on...